Perceived Risk
What I anticipate may happen.
A Lived-Experience-Informed Framework for Understanding Intersectional Regulation of Neurodivergent Expression
What happens when neurodivergent expression is interpreted through everything else the world already believes about the person expressing it?
Neurocultural Throttling grew from my attempt to understand the calculations that can emerge when neurotype, racialization, identity, interpretation, and power meet in the same room.
This video walks through the question that led to the framework, the scholarship surrounding it, and several of its central distinctions. The full paper goes considerably deeper into the research, limitations, boundaries, positionality, and proposed research agenda.
How can the same behavior mean one thing to the person doing it and something very different to the person observing it?
I had language for autistic masking and camouflaging. I had language for racial code-switching, minority stress, intersectionality, and the ways marginalized people learn to navigate environments that were not necessarily designed with them in mind.
What I kept struggling to name was what could happen between those conversations, particularly when neurodivergent expression was not interpreted independently of race, gender, culture, status, or other socially situated identities.
Neurocultural Throttling is my attempt to investigate that space without replacing the concepts that already help us understand it.
Neurocultural Throttling describes context-responsive regulation of neurodivergent or culturally situated expression when a person anticipates that its meaning or consequence may change because neurotype and another marginalized identity are being interpreted together.
Sometimes we learn that the same behavior can be understood differently depending on who is doing it. Neurocultural Throttling describes some of the adjustments a person may make after learning that their neurodivergence and another marginalized identity can change how their behavior is read.
What I anticipate may happen.
What observers or institutions can actually be shown to do.
How much room I believe I have.
How much room the environment actually gives me.
Masking, camouflaging, racial code-switching, identity shifting, minority stress, emotional regulation, and intersectionality already explain important parts of this terrain. Neurocultural Throttling is not an argument that those concepts are wrong or obsolete.
The framework focuses more narrowly on what may happen when neurotype and another marginalized identity shape the meaning of one another's expression, and on the regulation that may follow when a person learns to anticipate that interpretation.
How much should I regulate?
Why has this environment made so much regulation feel necessary?
Who gets more room?
The full paper develops the scholarly foundation for the framework, emerging Black autistic research, the distinctions between perceived and evaluative risk and latitude, compensatory effort, limitations, potential organizational misuse, and a proposed research agenda.
Neurocultural Throttling is a lived-experience-informed conceptual framework and scholarly synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, a validated psychological mechanism, an employee assessment, or a method for teaching marginalized neurodivergent people to regulate themselves more effectively.
Its value will depend not simply on whether the theory makes intellectual sense, but whether racialized and otherwise marginalized neurodivergent people recognize the experience it attempts to describe, challenge it, refine it, or ultimately prefer different language.